Skip to content
Home

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Writings
June 6, 2015 Catholic Social Thought, Orthodox Social Thought

Acton, Progressives, and Orthodoxy

Imagine my surprise when I found out that Orthodoxy is under progressive captivity in America, or so says Fr. Johannes Jacobse. Writing partially in response to Orthodox dissent over the 2013 Acton Institute/St. Vladimir’s Seminary conference on poverty, Fr. Jacbse attributes any and all Orthodox dissatisfaction with Acton’s pro-market agenda to “Orthodox Progressives,” an undefined cabal of Christians whose vision is “materialist,” that is one which holds that “man is a biological machine” and “a better society is achieved by manipulating the mechanisms of state.” While these elements may be part of the progressive vision writ large, it still doesn’t mean they are part of a peculiarly “Orthodox Progressive” vision, assuming such a vision exists in the first place. By refusing to identify a single soul who may be fairly called an “Orthodox Progressive,” Fr. Jacobse sets up a convenient hobgoblin that no right-thinking man would want anything to do with. The problem is that he may not exist. But if he does exist, rest assured that any of his ideas which may not coalesce with Acton’s preferred economic ideology are wrong a priori.

The type of ideological bullying Fr. Jacobse seems (perhaps unwittingly) to engage in is unfortunate, but it’s nothing new. Anyone who has followed the course of Acton’s treatment of Roman Catholics faithful to their confession’s social magisterium knows by now that the institute promotes a culture of insularity among its adherents, and all others are left to the outer darkness to be mocked, derided, and misrepresented by Acton representatives. Two examples will help illustrate this point.

First, the official website for Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg’s recent book, Tea Party Catholic, features a “quiz” which openly mocks traditional Catholics as conspiracy theorists beholden to the outmoded, if not dead, doctrine of Christ’s social kingship. These same Catholics, the sort who reject Tea Party-style politics on the basis of principles drawn from both reason and revelation, are also castigated as heresy hunters who seek to violently coerce non-Catholics into their religion. Nowhere on the website or in the book does Gregg intelligently confront Catholics who—Heaven forbid—disagree with his viewpoints. Instead, they are vilified as “statists” enraptured by some sick social vision that throw us all back to the dark ages.

Second, at Acton’s annual “University,” an annual “course” is offered on Distributism, a largely Catholic socio-economic vision that has over a century of serious thinking sitting behind it. (Distributism is not exclusive to Catholics, however.) Rather than allow the course to be taught by actual card-carrying Distributists, Acton instead chooses to hand over the reins to Todd Flanders, an unabashed economic liberal who not only fails to take his subject matter seriously, but seems incapable of properly articulating what it is Distributsts actually believe. Because Distributism is not free-market in nature, the (false) conclusion reached is that its model is top-down and interventionist. No one who has read seriously Belloc, Chesterton, Storck, or Medaille could believe such a thing, but Acton has no interest in its followers knowing that.

While Acton’s attempts to make direct incursions into the American Orthodox intellectual world seems to have stalled (the 2013 Acton/St. Vladimir’s conference was the only one), the institute continues to recruit Orthodox voices to help bolster its overarching claim that Christianity and economic liberalism are not only compatible, but that the former ought to provide a fresh moral foundation for the latter. Since its inception, right-believing Catholics of various stripes have resisted Acton’s highly questionable economic and doctrinal claims. They have been able to do so on the basis of the Catholic Church’s rich social tradition, one which does not banish true justice from the marketplace in favor of pure economic efficiency.

For an Orthodox Christian to resist Acton does not entail adopting some dubious progressive ideology which, if it were real, would no doubt hold to ideas that are manifestly un-Christian in nature. All it means is looking at man through a Christocentric lens while paying heed to the great Fathers of the Church who taught continually on the duties of society to the poor, the just role of property in society, and the dangers of avarice. Such teachings may not be as centralized as those that are available to Catholics, but they do exist and they do provide the foundation for developing an authentically Orthodox social teaching.

Share:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Books For Sale – Theological/Spiritual (Part 1)
Next Post →
Some Comments for Wednesday
Gabriel S. Sanchez

You may also like

  1. Gregg Contra Corporatism

    October 20, 2022

  2. A Few More Thoughts on Edward Feser’s All One in Christ

    August 24, 2022

  3. Edward Feser’s All One in Christ: Initial Thoughts

    August 22, 2022

Categories

  • Autobiographical
  • Books
  • Catholic Social Thought
  • Church
  • Eastern Catholicism
  • Eastern Orthodox Church
  • Economics
  • Ephemera
  • Humor
  • Integralism
  • Law
  • Liturgy
  • Meta
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Orthodox Social Thought
  • Philosophy
  • Political Economy
  • Politics
  • Reading
  • Roman Catholic Church
  • Sale
  • Spirituality
  • Theology
  • Uncategorized
  • World
  • Wrestling
  • Year of 100 Books

Archives

  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • March 2022
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
2025 © Opus PublicumTheme by SiteOrigin