Skip to content
Home

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Writings
June 29, 2014 Catholic Social Thought, Politics

Inaction

The other day I was chatting with an online acquaintance about Jean Ousset’s Action (IHS Press 2002). First serialized in French in 1966/67, the work represents Oussett’s pinnacle contribution to classic Catholic social thought and yet remains largely ignored by contemporary Catholics. Though Ousset was in no sense the last of Catholicism’s great counterrevolutionary thinkers, he was one of the last to direct the majority of his energy to problems outside the Church rather than the multitude of those metastasizing within her. Action was composed right at the point when liberalism tipped the balance of power within the Catholic Church, distorting doctrine, renovating the liturgy, and confusing (if not scandalizing) the faithful along the way. Since that time faithful Catholics concerned about the direction of the (post)modern world have contended themselves with refreshing our understanding of the principles of right order drawn from the time-honored teachings of the Church and her most steadfast theologians. As laudable as that work is, it is also true that it is not enough. Ousset recognized as much; he knew that firm principles, rooted in the truth, must be accompanied by action. Catholics are not allowed, according to Ousset, to sit back and wait for better times; they cannot tempt God into doing the work of restoration for us. Ousset, unlike many today, took St. Augustine’s following dictum with the utmost seriousness: “Work as if everything depends on you. Pray as if everything depends on God.”

The overall numbers are paltry, but we know that today there are many souls who pray continually for the Church as if everything depends on God. Do they work, however, as if everything depends on them? Some do, but certainly not enough. None of us do enough. When there are tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of faithful Catholics kneeling before the altar every Sunday as their priest recites the Roman Mass for all time and yet, upon exiting their parishes, exercise no energy toward continuing the spread of the vetus ordo, contended as they are with what little is offered them, do we not have more work to do? And when these same Catholics turn a blind eye toward wider abuses within the Church so long as their little pocket of the Corpus Mysticum remains “pristine,” have we actually done anything at all? Some of us don’t want to cause a fuss. We fear that if we do then what little we have may be taken away. Maybe tso, but the work of restoration requires sacrifice; it demands risk. The truth does not become secondary because it happens to be inconvenient.

Am I getting ahead of myself? There is a good argument to be made that while incremental action is always required, the devastation wrought over the past five decades has left us in what might be called the “principles phase” of restoration. In other words, since many of us today are so ignorant or confused about the principles of the Church, the basis of her being, and her true mission in the world yesterday, today, and forever, the only prudent activity to be undertaken now is to reeducate ourselves and others; only then can true action be put into place. But how long will that last? At what point do we say, “Enough talk; now it’s time for the harder work to begin!”? Will we ever get there? Or will we succumb that that very modern, very liberal, temptation to involve ourselves in endless chatter, an unceasing discussion, that never terminates in a decision—a decision for action?

If this problem appears grave within the walls of the Church, it is graver by an order of magnitude in society today. When Oussett wrote in the 1960s, he perhaps wrote with the hope that the Church would still, even after letting in some “fresh air,” continue to be what she had to become in the modern world, namely a bulwark against error and a bastion for the rights of God over and against liberal errors which continue to breed indifferentism, relativism, and individualism. No Catholic can write with such hope now, or at least not more than a few flickers of hope. A Catholic concerned with the upending of truth in the (post)modern world looks to the indefectible teaching of the Church, but not to her largely, though thankfully not completely, defective leadership. Such a Catholic will point to where the world has gone astray while the Church, in her doctrine, remains on the right path. However, he will rarely feel empowered or emboldened to do anything more than that. What backing does he have? And is he not flirting with drawing the ire of his fellow churchmen if he should take action in the name of any truth which is out-of-step with the Zeitgesit? The Church made peace with the modern world half-a-century ago, or so we’ve been told. Let’s keep this peace and do nothing more than what the modern world will allow us to do: discuss, discuss, discuss.

Today’s battle, today’s counterrevolution, must be conducted on two fronts: one internal and one external. Society is decaying; we cannot simply chatter about it or, worse, capitulate to the rot. The Church has cancer; Christ tells us that she will never die, but can she fully live until she is cured? Assuming there was ever a time to “wait and see,” that moment passed some time ago. Still, if a ray of light to be found in the present darkness it is this: We have no need to hang our heads in shame and weep over our failures because the real work, the true action we are all called to undertake as one people of God under the Kingship of Christ, has yet to begin.

Share:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Post navigation

← Previous Post
More on 1962
Next Post →
Hobby Lobby
Gabriel S. Sanchez

You may also like

  1. Gregg Contra Corporatism

    October 20, 2022

  2. A Few More Thoughts on Edward Feser’s All One in Christ

    August 24, 2022

  3. Edward Feser’s All One in Christ: Initial Thoughts

    August 22, 2022

Categories

  • Autobiographical
  • Books
  • Catholic Social Thought
  • Church
  • Eastern Catholicism
  • Eastern Orthodox Church
  • Economics
  • Ephemera
  • Humor
  • Integralism
  • Law
  • Liturgy
  • Meta
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Orthodox Social Thought
  • Philosophy
  • Political Economy
  • Politics
  • Reading
  • Roman Catholic Church
  • Sale
  • Spirituality
  • Theology
  • Uncategorized
  • World
  • Wrestling
  • Year of 100 Books

Archives

  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • March 2022
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
2025 © Opus PublicumTheme by SiteOrigin