Skip to content
Home

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Writings
January 15, 2015 Catholic Social Thought, Politics

Revisiting the Blasphemy Question

On his blog yesterday, Fr. John Zuhlsdorf called attention to a Reporters Without Borders initiative to compel religious leaders to acknowledge that blasphemy is a right—one which is higher than (the liberal conception of) religious liberty. Today, in the course of his visit to Asia, Pope Francis had some other thoughts on the matter. Here are some excerpts taken from the translation up at Rorate Caeli.

We cannot provoke, we cannot insult the faith of others, we cannot mock faith.

Pope Benedict, in an address I cannot recall well [note: the Regensburg address] had spoken of this post-positivist mindset, of this post-positivist metaphysics that led, in the end, to believe that all religions, or all religious expressions, are a kind of sub-culture: they are tolerated, but they are irrelevant, they are not in the culture of the Enlightenment. This is a legacy of the Enlightenment.

There are so many people who speak ill of religions, who mock them, who play with the religion of others. They provoke[.] . . . Each religion has dignity, each religion that respects human life and man, and I cannot mock it…it’s a limit. I take the example of the limit to say that, in the matter of the freedom of speech, there are limits[.]

It’s not entirely clear what the Holy Father is driving at here, though it would seem that Francis believes that speech which mocks any religion is morally wrong and can, perhaps, be prohibited legally. As I noted in my unintentionally controversial post, “A Comment on Charlie Hebdo,” actual blasphemy is only committed when it is directed against God and His Holy Church. The Pope appears to have a more broadminded approach to what constitutes blasphemy. It’s not entirely clear why, however. (A “broadminded” approach is not the same as a “liberal approach,” such as what Joe Carter of the Acton Institute defended on Twitter last year.)

Perhaps the Holy Father believes, as a prudential matter, that any mockery of any religion in society is likely to undermine public order because the passions such mockery may inflame. As such, blasphemous speech (broadly understood) is out of bounds. If that is so, then there is no reason why any Catholic should feel compelled to question his words. On the other hand, if the Pope means to imply that all religions are effectively equal or by right warrant equal protection and recognition from men and society, then that may put his off-the-cuff remarks at odds with the Second Vatican Council’s Dignitatis Humane, paragraph 1, which, in part, reads: “[This document] leaves untouched traditional Catholic doctrine on the moral duty of men and societies toward the true religion and toward the one Church of Christ.”

As a final note, it is unclear exactly what constitutes blasphemous speech in the Pope’s mind. Certainly the inflammatory cartoons run regularly in the pages of Charlie Hebdo count. How about a Catholic tract describing the errors of Islam and the falsity of Allah? By Muslim lights, such speech is blasphemous. At the same time, does the Church not have a duty to witness against false religions and lead all people to the truth? How can it faithfully carry out the Great Commission without speaking out forcefully against error? Maybe the Pope, or some enterprising official at the Vatican Press Office, will clarify this matter soon.

Share:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Looking Back, Looking Ahead
Next Post →
A Critical Remark on Linklater’s Boyhood
Gabriel S. Sanchez

You may also like

  1. Gregg Contra Corporatism

    October 20, 2022

  2. A Few More Thoughts on Edward Feser’s All One in Christ

    August 24, 2022

  3. Edward Feser’s All One in Christ: Initial Thoughts

    August 22, 2022

Categories

  • Autobiographical
  • Books
  • Catholic Social Thought
  • Church
  • Eastern Catholicism
  • Eastern Orthodox Church
  • Economics
  • Ephemera
  • Humor
  • Integralism
  • Law
  • Liturgy
  • Meta
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Orthodox Social Thought
  • Philosophy
  • Political Economy
  • Politics
  • Reading
  • Roman Catholic Church
  • Sale
  • Spirituality
  • Theology
  • Uncategorized
  • World
  • Wrestling
  • Year of 100 Books

Archives

  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • March 2022
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
2025 © Opus PublicumTheme by SiteOrigin