Skip to content
Home

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Writings
June 18, 2014 Catholic Social Thought, Politics

The Fortnight and the Syllabus

With the Fortnight for Freedom (FFF) just over the horizon and many conservative Catholic eyes fixed anxiously on the Supreme Court as the country awaits the outcome of Sabelius v. Hobby Lobby (the “HHS Mandate case”), perhaps now would be a good time for the Church in America to follow the lead of Fr. John Hunwicke by reminding the faithful that 2014 is the sesquicentenary of Blessed Pope Pius IX’s 1864 encyclical Quanta Cura and its annex, the Syllabus Errorum. Although the Syllabus condemned some 80 propositions, the following sampling of errors could serve as a fruitful basis for meditation before our Eucharistic King during the forthcoming 14 days of prayer prescribed by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB):

15. Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true.

16. Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation, and arrive at eternal salvation.

17. Good hope at least is to be entertained of the eternal salvation of all those who are not at all in the true Church of Christ.

19. The Church is not a true and perfect society, entirely free – nor is she endowed with proper and perpetual rights of her own, conferred upon her by her Divine Founder; but it appertains to the civil power to define what are the rights of the Church, and the limits within which she may exercise those rights.

20. The ecclesiastical power ought not to exercise its authority without the permission and assent of the civil government.

39. The State, as being the origin and source of all rights, is endowed with a certain right not circumscribed by any limits.

41. The civil government, even when in the hands of an infidel sovereign, has a right to an indirect negative power over religious affairs. It therefore possesses not only the right called that of “exsequatur,” but also that of appeal, called “appellatio ab abusu.”

55. The Church ought to be separated from the .State, and the State from the Church.

77. In the present day it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be held as the only religion of the State, to the exclusion of all other forms of worship.

79. Moreover, it is false that the civil liberty of every form of worship, and the full power, given to all, of overtly and publicly manifesting any opinions whatsoever and thoughts, conduce more easily to corrupt the morals and minds of the people, and to propagate the pest of indifferentism.

80. The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization.

Now, at first blush it may seem strange to use the Syllabus or any other papal encyclical condemning liberal errors as a wellspring for prayerful reflection, but the practice is not without precedent. As Bishop Bernard Tissier de Mallerais quoted in his 2011 Angelus Press Conference talk, “Archbishop Lefebvre: A Life for Christ the King,” the late Irish expositor of Catholic Social Teaching, Fr. Denis Fahey, referred to the Syllabus as a “principal object of my meditations on the royalty of Christ and its relation to the priesthood.”

Here, during the FFF, it would likely be prudent to modify slightly the aim of Fr. Fahey’s meditations, retaining, of course, proper focus on the royalty—the kingship—of our Lord Jesus Christ while opening our hearts to what that kingship, a social kingship as defined clearly and succinctly by Pope Pius XI in Quas Primas, means for Catholics living in a secular liberal society. All of the condemned errors cited above were condemned precisely because they revolt against the Kingship of Christ and His right to reign over not just individuals, but society as well. This is no easy task, but that it is a task—and perhaps the task of Catholic social witness today—was recognized recently by the Dominican theologian Fr. Aidan Nichols: “Publicly recognizing divine revelation is an entailment of the Kingship of Christ on which, despite its difficulties in a post-Enlightenment society, we must not renege.”

Perhaps the burden of standing up for the social rights of Christ the King and His Catholic and Apostolic Church could be made easier were the principles a bit clearer. It is no doubt confusing for many of the faithful to hear the USCCB and the clergy under its watch speak of libertas religionis when they should proclaim unequivocally libertas ecclesiae. When that happens, it would seem as if the Catholic Church had baptized the thought of John Locke and America’s so-called Founding Fathers, which all of us who have studied the tradition of the Church while continuing to read that tradition through what Pope-Emeritus Benedict XVI called a “hermeneutic of continuity” know is impossible. (For those of us who prefer the more direct route of reading the past half-century of magisterial teachings in the light of tradition, the reality of the impossibility of sanctifying liberal error may be even sharper.)

With that in mind, let me suggest that now, during the convergence of the FFF and the “Year of the Syllabus,” that it would be expedient for the USCCB to issue a statement both praising the rectitude and holiness of Blessed Pius IX and reminding the faithful, clergy and lay, that the great martyrs of the Church such as Saints Thomas More, John Fischer, Panteleimon, George, and Ignatius of Antioch, did not have their earthly pilgrimages put to a violent end for such a vague, nay, obscuring and misleading principle like “religious liberty.” St. Theodore of Amasea didn’t set fire to the temple of Cybele to vindicate the rights of Sethian and Basildean Gnostics.

Should the USCCB be clear-minded and forthright enough to issue a statement along these lines, I do hope as well that they would attach the following prayer to it. Prior to the Second Vatican Council it carried a plenary indulgence under the usual conditions (Confession, Communion, and prayers for the Pope’s intentions). Maybe the USCCB can appeal quickly to Rome for the indulgence to be reinstituted during the FFF. There’s still time.

O Christ Jesus, I acknowledge Thee as Universal King. For Thee all creatures have been made. Do Thou exercise over me all Thy rights. Renewing my baptismal vows, I renounce Satan, with his works and pomps, and I promise to live as a good Catholic. Especially do I pledge myself to work with all of my power for the triumph of the rights of God and of Thy Church. Divine Heart of Jesus, I offer Thee all my poor actions to obtain that all hearts may recognize Thy Sacred Royalty, and that thus the reign of Thy peace may be established throughout the entire world. Amen.

Note: This post contains material which appeared previously on Opus Publicum: “Year of the Syllabus – Don’t Forget,” 6/17/2014.

Share:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Rebegin
Next Post →
Catholic Libertarianism
Gabriel S. Sanchez

You may also like

  1. Gregg Contra Corporatism

    October 20, 2022

  2. A Few More Thoughts on Edward Feser’s All One in Christ

    August 24, 2022

  3. Edward Feser’s All One in Christ: Initial Thoughts

    August 22, 2022

Categories

  • Autobiographical
  • Books
  • Catholic Social Thought
  • Church
  • Eastern Catholicism
  • Eastern Orthodox Church
  • Economics
  • Ephemera
  • Humor
  • Integralism
  • Law
  • Liturgy
  • Meta
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Orthodox Social Thought
  • Philosophy
  • Political Economy
  • Politics
  • Reading
  • Roman Catholic Church
  • Sale
  • Spirituality
  • Theology
  • Uncategorized
  • World
  • Wrestling
  • Year of 100 Books

Archives

  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • March 2022
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
2025 © Opus PublicumTheme by SiteOrigin