Skip to content
Home

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Writings
November 19, 2014 Catholic Social Thought

Ignoring Catholic Social Teaching

Daniel Saudek, making his debut over at Ethika Politika (EP), has a piece worth reading: “Faith, Reason, and the Two Camps.” Of course, not every piece worth reading is worth agreeing with on all points. While Saudek does a commendable job surveying the tensions that exist between Catholic Social Teaching (CST) and contemporary political conservatism (“free-market conservatism”), be brings in concepts and documents which aren’t particularly helpful. For instance, when discussing a living wage, Saudek points to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, a shopworn charter that is more hortatory than substantive. Most countries around the world ignore part or all of it. It seems to me that if one is going to talk about a living wage (or, rather, a just wage), then the place to begin is the Church’s social magisterium, starting with Pope Leo XIII’s Rerum Novarum and Pius XI’s Quadragesimo Anno.

This, I think, is the heart of the problem. Though Saudek makes a compelling case that our weak intellectual climate shoulders some of the blame for conservative Catholics (or, if one prefers, neoliberal or libertarian Catholics) ignoring CST, I think he bypasses the willful ignorance and selective hermeneutics that is often at work among Catholics who have no compunction about claiming to be pro-family, anti-abortion, and doctrinally orthodox while committed to unchecked capitalism and the mythical construct often referred to as “the free market.” This is partially motived by the fact that these conservatives do not believe CST has any doctrinal value because it deals with matters the Church is not competent to speak on authoritatively, or so the conservatives claim. Moreover, there is the money factor as well. Think tanks and publications which promote capitalism and markets draw donors; those which argue for the contrary don’t (at least not at the rate the pro-capitalist ones do). Whether the money factor makes the pro-capitalist wing intellectually dishonest or not would have to be judged on a case by case basis. The matter isn’t out of the question, however.

Where Saudek seems to be on firmer ground is with respect to denigration and/or distortion of natural law and reason. While certain elements of CST have a strong Scriptural foundation, most of its principles are rooted in a thick conception of natural justice and the right organization of society. This is why, for example, Distributists argue that even though their position is grounded in CST, it does not require a mainly Catholic society to implement (though that may make things easier). A large contingent of human beings today, including Catholic and non-Catholic Christians, reject natural reason or have downgraded its importance in favor of arguments rooted in aesthetics and hermeneutics. And a good number of conservative Catholics who pay lip service to natural law and reason tend to do so with either the so-called “New Natural Law Theory” in mind, or some sort of conflation of classic and modern (Enlightenment) natural-law thinking.

As a final quibble with Saudek’s thought-provoking article, let me say this. The claim that CST “is not competent to give answers to technical questions” is one that has to be made with caution. Catholics wedded to economic liberalism commonly invoke that claim to shelve almost all of CST’s tenets without distinction. Shifting socio-economic circumstances, along with variability in culture, resources, and adopted legal systems, militate against a “one size fits all” approach to applying CST. However, the technical questions policymakers are typically faced with, ranging from taxation to regulation to property rights, have been contemplated by the Church’s social magisterium. Deleterious taxation, for instance, is impermissible, but discriminatory taxing schemes which take into account the concrete earnings of those individuals and entities which are subject to it, are not. Similarly, while CST does not foreordain the number and type of regulatory agencies a polity ought to have, it clearly supports the use of regulation to protect disadvantaged and politically weak classes in society.

Share:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Post navigation

← Previous Post
On Whether to Move Forward
Next Post →
Weekly Reading – November 21, 2014
Gabriel S. Sanchez

You may also like

  1. Gregg Contra Corporatism

    October 20, 2022

  2. A Few More Thoughts on Edward Feser’s All One in Christ

    August 24, 2022

  3. Edward Feser’s All One in Christ: Initial Thoughts

    August 22, 2022

Categories

  • Autobiographical
  • Books
  • Catholic Social Thought
  • Church
  • Eastern Catholicism
  • Eastern Orthodox Church
  • Economics
  • Ephemera
  • Humor
  • Integralism
  • Law
  • Liturgy
  • Meta
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Orthodox Social Thought
  • Philosophy
  • Political Economy
  • Politics
  • Reading
  • Roman Catholic Church
  • Sale
  • Spirituality
  • Theology
  • Uncategorized
  • World
  • Wrestling
  • Year of 100 Books

Archives

  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • March 2022
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
2025 © Opus PublicumTheme by SiteOrigin